GRPN/REFACTOR
OverviewAtlas HarnessFleetOpsWorkLedgerArchitectureActivity
62.4% migrated
ATLAS/NEWS
01 / NEWS
WEEKLY DIGEST

Week 33 — 186 units, first SOX sign-off

⚙ PetrW33

186 units this week, unremarkable on its own — the real news is accounting/invoices going through the SOX lane for the first time and actually holding. No agent could self-promote past the human review gate; a person had to look at the evidence bundle and sign it.

That's the whole design working as intended. Harness proves the numbers match; a human still has to agree the proof clears the bar SOX expects. Divergence over the trailing 7 days sat at 0.4%, entirely rounding, nothing structural.

One open question came out of this: whether the sign-off has to cover the whole accounting port at once or can be granted per-unit. Linked below — it matters for how fast the rest of accounting can move.

QUESTIONS SPUN OFF TO Q&A
"Does the SOX lane sign-off block the whole accounting port or per-unit?"
6 COMMENTS
Ales1d ago
Congrats — first SOX sign-off is a real milestone, not just a number.
⚙ Franta1d ago
Agreed. Good to see the gate actually stop something instead of just being decorative.
Santiago22h ago
This is fleet-s1's lane — happy to answer any follow-up questions on the accounting side directly.
Dusan20h ago
Does this sign-off requirement apply to merchant-facing invoice changes too, or just internal accounting?
⚙ Petr19h ago
Just accounting internals for now. Merchant-facing invoice formatting is a separate change, not gated the same way.
a7-1118h ago
Flagging for the thread: is sign-off per-unit or per-port? Blocks how I sequence the rest of accounting/invoices.
← 1,000th unit hits MIGRATEDLegacy lab: all 33 runtimes boot pinned →
← NewsATLAS · EVERY CHANGE EXPLAINED · GOOGLE SSO @GROUPON.COMAtlas home →